Archive for the 'GE' Category

GM crops banned in Switzerland until 2012

The Swiss Federal Council (government) has voted to extend the country’s moratorium on genetically modified (GM) plants for a further three years beyond the current expiry date of November 2010, Dow Jones reports.

Continue reading ‘GM crops banned in Switzerland until 2012′

“Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic

Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t.Get educated - take action.

Continue reading ‘“Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic’

Will Wheat-Killer Fungus Be Use To Spread GMO Wheat?

Continue reading ‘Will Wheat-Killer Fungus Be Use To Spread GMO Wheat?’

Canadian Farmer Forces GM Giant Back to Court

Percy Schmeiser has grim reaper Monsanto back in court for their bully boy tactics.

Continue reading ‘Canadian Farmer Forces GM Giant Back to Court’

Police tear-gas farmers in clash over French GM crops

Small- farmers … claim citizens’ right to destroy crops which threaten ecological calamity and the subjection of farmers to the whims of agro-industrial, multinational companies.
Coming to a small town near you.
Continue reading ‘Police tear-gas farmers in clash over French GM crops’

Syngenta Patent on Terminator Potato Exposes NZ Labour Party’s Big Business Bias

corporate crime GE health terrorism

GE Free NZ
16 January 2007
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0701/S00049.htm

Patent on ‘Terminator’ Potato Shows Labour Party Policy Lacks Moral Integrity

The moral basis for The Labour Party’s backing of “Terminator” technology is called into question by moves by Syngenta to register a patent on “Terminator” potatoes internationally.

New Zealand’s Labour-led government is one of a handful of governments to reject a defacto moratorium on Terminator technology supported by the rest of the world.

But the threat to poor farmers in developing countries has been brought into sharp focus by a coalition of indigenous peoples in the Andes who warn that Syngenta’s patents are a signal they plan to commercialise ‘Terminator technology’.

The Andes is the centre of diversity for potatoes and there are fears that the move will threaten more than 3,000 local potato varieties that form the basis of livelihoods and culture for millions of poor people in the region.

Syngenta has reportedly been granted Terminator potato patents in Australia and Russia and has also applied for similar patents in Europe, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt and Poland.

The coalition represented by indigenous farmers wants Syngenta to publicly disown the patent, which describes a genetic-modification process that could be used to stop potatoes from sprouting unless a chemical is applied.

In 2000 the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recommended that governments not field-test or commercialise genetic seed sterilisation technologies - thus creating a de-facto international moratorium. In 2006, the CBD rejected a proposal - backed by Australia, Canada and New Zealand - to allow field trials of the crops on a
case-by-case basis.

“The Labour Party has failed to respond to the very real ethical and social issues that Terminator technology raises, and have even denied an informal moratorium exists,” says Jon Carapiet from GE Free NZ in food and environment.

“Now we have a company patenting an approach akin to “Verminator” technology (nicknamed by the UK media because it used a gene derived from rats), that would require farmers to pay for, and apply a chemical to make the plants grow at all.”

One concern for the Peruvian indigenous communities is that the Terminator potatoes will contaminate local varieties and destroy their traditions of storing and exchanging potato tubers for future planting. With “Terminator” seeds are made infertile after the first planting; with “Verminator” the plants won’t grow at all unless a chemical is used to activate them.

“The Labour Party must review its policy of supporting Terminator ‘case by case’ and of ignoring the global defacto moratorium,” says Jon Carapiet.

The New Zealand government’s failure to join with the rest of the international community in supporting a moratorium, (so that the serious social and ethical issues are considered before commercial development of “Terminator”), is a moral failure largely driven by expectations of profit from life-patents.

The New Zealand government should make clear its desire to keep faith with farmers in the developing world and at home, and get behind the moratorium now.

REFERENCES

‘Insulted’ Andean farmers pick GM potato fight with multinational Syngenta
AUTHOR: International Institute for Environment and Development and the
Quechua-Ayamara Association for Nature and Sustainable Development
12 January 2007
http://www.iied.org and http://www.andes.org.pe

World’s First Breed Of Designer Chickens Are Genetically Modified To Lay Eggs Capable Of Producing Drugs

cancer corporate crime GE health

Jonathan Leake
(Courtesy : The Times of India, June 15, 2006)

Scientists have created the world’s first breed of designer chickens, genetically modified to lay eggs capable of producing drugs that fight cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Researchers at the Roslin Institute near Edinburgh, which created Dolly the cloned sheep, have bred a 500-strong flock of the birds. The breakthrough offers the prospect of mass-producing drugs that currently cost the NHS thousands of pounds a year per patient, at a fraction of the price.

The ISA Browns, a common breed of egg-laying hen, have each had human genes added to their DNA to enable them to produce complex medicinal proteins. These human proteins are secreted into the whites of the eggs, from which they can be easily extracted to produce drugs.

The Roslin scientists have achieved a world first in creating birds that “breed true”, meaning the added human genes are passed on from generation to generation. This opens the way for the creation of industrial-scale flocks and offers a potentially unlimited cheap source of medicinal proteins.

One of the chicken lines produces human interferon of a kind closely resembling a drug widely used to treat multiple sclerosis. Such drugs have a potential worldwide market worth hundreds of millions. Another line could be useful in treating skin cancer, by producing miR24, an antibody that could also potentially treat arthritis.

The institute is understood to have created at least two other lines of genetically modified chicken, whose eggs could produce drugs with the potential to fight cancer.

The research is a triumph for Helen Sang, the leader of the Roslin team who, since 1997, has sought to make the technique work without new genes being lost as they are transmitted down the generations. Ian Wilmut, the Edinburgh University professor who created Dolly at Roslin, was an adviser on the project.

“This is potentially a very powerful new way to produce specialised drugs,” said Karen Jervis of Viragen Scotland, a biotech company that is working closely with Roslin. “We have bred five generations of chickens so far and they all keep producing high concentrations of pharmaceuticals.”

Other researchers have already produced transgenic chickens—with artificially altered DNA—but the ability to make desirable proteins has generally vanished in a generation or two.

At present, therapeutic proteins are mainly made in bio-reactors, vats of bacteria or other cells that have been genetically modified. However, extracting the proteins is expensive and difficult.

In Roslin’s research—to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences tomorrow—the scientists will describe how they extracted embryonic cockerels from hens, before the eggs had formed.

The embryos, small clusters of cells, were then each injected into surrogate eggs and “infected” with a virus genetically modified to contain human genes. These genes contained the blueprint for the human proteins that the researchers were trying to produce. SUNDAY TIMES

“We have allowed (the drugs) industry to subvert the rules of science. We have watched quietly as governments and academics have colluded with industry to hide information critical to our patients. We have remained silent as our medical schools have churned out graduates who have no knowledge of the dilemmas and scandals of medicine. We have allowed many of our medical journals to become corrupted and timid,” - Dr Aubrey Blumsohn